Ian Shapira from The Washington Post has written an article this week describing how many young teachers in Washington DC have Facebook accounts that are publicly accessible and are filled with content that represents them in inappropriate ways. Essentially, they are being young adults, but in a way that they don’t realize is in the public domain.
It’s almost like Googling someone: Log on to Facebook. Join the Washington, D.C., network. Search the Web site for your favorite school system. And then watch the public profiles of 20-something teachers unfurl like gift wrap on the screen, revealing a sense of humor that can be overtly sarcastic or unintentionally unprofessional — or both.
The article goes on to ask whether teachers should be judged on their out-of-school lives if it doesn’t affect their effectiveness with students:
Do the risque pages matter if teacher performance is not hindered and if students, parents and school officials don’t see them? At what point are these young teachers judged by the standards for public officials?
In states including Florida, Colorado, Tennessee and Massachusetts, teachers have been removed or suspended for MySpace postings, and some teachers unions have begun warning members about racy personal Web sites. But as Facebook, with 70 million members, and other social networking sites continue to grow, scrutiny will no doubt spread locally.
Whether they “should” or not is a big discussion point, but whether they “will” or not really isn’t.
In today’s society where political correctness reigns and public scrutiny and “moral” standards are held in front of everyone’s face, there is no doubt that Washington DC will follow the other states in removing teachers for social networking behavior.
Do adults need to be re-taught what privacy means since it’s meaning has changed with the coming of the internet?
Do they know how to manage their own Facebook accounts - never mind teach students how to protect theirs?
Like several other teachers interviewed, Webster said she thought her page could be seen only by people she accepted as “friends.” But like those of many teachers on Facebook, Webster’s profile was accessible by the more than 525,000 members of the Washington, D.C., network. Anyone can join any geographic network.
Are young teachers in training ready to defend their Facebook profile in an interview?
“I know for a fact that when a superintendent in Missouri was interviewing potential teachers last year, he would ask, ‘Do you have a Facebook or MySpace page?’ ” said Todd Fuller, a spokesman for the Missouri State Teachers Association, which is warning members to clean up their pages. “If the candidate said yes, then the superintendent would say, ‘I’ve got my computer up right now. Let’s take a look.’ “
Ultimately, the lessons of cyber-safety and responsibility that we teach our students needs to be shared with our teachers too. It should be included in their professional training (along with learning to use web 2.0 tools to enhance education of course).
All students, no matter what future profession they go into, also need to see the importance of knowing what they share and how they share online. And what better way to model this for a teacher than to share the very impact it has on our own lives and how we are perceived through what we and others share online.
Too many believe that the rules of public behavior are abandoned in Facebook. Here’s a terrific video which makes this very clear. Thanks to Brian Lockwood for the link to this on Twitter.
Tags: Cybersafety, facebook, ProD, socialnetworking, teachers, washpost



Entries (RSS)
May 1st, 2008 at 10:01 am
Will Richardson has written a post on this WashPost article as well.
The conversation in the comments is worth reading.
May 1st, 2008 at 11:07 am
Thank you for sharing this Dennis. I tell my students this all the time, and Elisabeth, too. They seem to believe Facebook is “private” but it isn’t as this article demonstrates. I will send it to USF!
May 1st, 2008 at 11:28 am
Rebecca, great to hear from you. Elisabeth is not alone. While what we mean by “private” hasn’t changed, where we think privacy is has. While we continue to transition into a constantly changing technological landscape of new tools, we hold on to our old understandings and ways in a world where different rules apply.
Some words that have different meaning online vs unplugged:
Friends
Sharing
Photo albums
The level to which those are public in the online world is something many people aren’t prepared for or at least aren’t thinking about.
Thanks for the comment!
May 5th, 2008 at 10:05 am
Dennis,
Thanks for posting this link, topical for me at the moment. Whether it’s online through FaceBook, MySpace, at a football game or down at the local pub … as a teacher I must know the audience and act in a way that is appropriate. KNOW THE AUDIENCE … KNOW THE AUDIENCE … KNOW THE AUDIENCE.
One of the issues with FaceBook is, can you really know the audience? Sure you can only allow friends to see your profile, but what’s to say your friends don’t share the information with others (as a group of Middle School students found out here recently). I’m now of the opinion you have to assume that anyone can see your FaceBook account.
May 6th, 2008 at 8:29 am
Chad,
You are so right. From a professional stand point, it is best to assume it’s public no matter what you do to lock down your profile. You never know what “friend” will later turn out to be a potential boss or even the friend of a potential boss.
Or worse yet, a parent or board member.
It’s one thing to behave responsibly, it’s another to make sure it’s documented. Or in other words, to make sure behaving irresponsibly is not.
May 6th, 2008 at 2:15 pm
[...] teachers very little has been done. As Dennis Harter alluded to on his Thinking Allowed blog, ‘Online Safety is for Teachers Too’, web 2.0 technology and sites such as FaceBook and MySpace are making this a real issue. [...]